• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 days ago

    They can. And if at any point it becomes untenable, you can just archive whatever you host, shut down your instance, and put the videos up for download somewhere.

    • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      20 days ago

      If a company is going bankrupt as a result of hosting a video service, they’re not going to be able to afford to archive and make it available for download either.

      • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        Archive storage is relatively cheap. It’s the bandwidth and compute required to serve video that is expensive

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 days ago

      I think this could lead to bigger activity pub instances collecting revenue for allowing company owned instances to federate. aka ad revenue.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Could you explain that idea in more detail? I’m not really sure I understand how that would work in practice.

        • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          Private instance for company/creator: Hey, can we federate with your instance?

          Large public instance: pay me.

          • Telorand@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 days ago

            Gotcha.

            The idea of a large public instance rubs me the wrong way, since it leads to behavior like that.