• Ooops@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      The wiki is actually good for beginners, too. As you are often forced to reallylly read through subpages and cross-referenced topics until you somewhat understand why you are doing something instead of just how. Doesn’t make it easy ofc but a beginner can totally handle the wiki, it just takes more time.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        Yeah, this has more or less sold me on giving arch a shot in the near future. I really need to get some fundamental Linux knowledge under my belt, and the arch wiki is legendary for being pretty comprehensive.

        • y0kai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 month ago

          I may get stabbed for this but, go for Endeavour, unless a (probably needlessly) tedious install process is important to you.

          I had vanilla Arch up and running for a bit but kept having issues with Steam, so switched to Endeavour and haven’t had any issues since. Its still a pretty basic version of Arch, with a few minor QoL improvements like having yay and a DE already installed.

    • Grian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      It isnt that hard, moved from wondows 10 to mint, and a few months later to arch, and it took me less than 2 hours to install arch, and thats with slow internet.

      And i learned a lot whole doing it, like Dekstop environments, disk partitoning(root, swap, and boot), filesystems, and a lot more.

      I wouldnt recommend it to everyone, but it is great if you want to learn more about computers.