• Comment105@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    “The painting itself was unharmed, but the 17th-century frame sustained some damage after the soup acted as paint stripper on the delicate surface.”

    So climate activists’ official position is to target the frames of these paintings, as they see them as important enough to piss people off but not important enough to preserve?

    Time to lock originals away from the public forever.

    • mmcintyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      Way to solve one of the most pressing issues of our day. Just great work, man. The planet really isn’t that important when compared to some 17th century art. That’s where we really need to focus our preservation and conservation efforts!

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 days ago

        That’s where we’re going to focus the problem solving, when that’s how you choose to stir shit up. We’re going to focus on preventing climate activists from destroying shit, and we’re going to talk about how to punish them.