• TMP_NKcYUEoM7kXg4qYe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    13 days ago

    This is a stupid argument. In FSF’s eyes even having nonfree repository (ie. for drivers) is bad so this is completely irrelevant for anyone considering flatpak or snap. Both have nonfree stuff in there.

    • JustMarkov@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 days ago

      Both have nonfree stuff in there.

      But flatpak’s backend is open source and self-hostable, while snap’s is proprietary and not self-hostable. Flatpak is the lesser of evils from this point of view.