• antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Frankly this comes off almost as a conspiracy theory. Christian art in Europe developed its typical imagery when the vast majority of Europeans could have no direct contact with non-Europeans, before colonialism or coherent ideas about racial identities, when far-off lands were thought to be occupied by one-legged giants…

    • NaevaTheRat@vegantheoryclub.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Dude: ports exist, people trade, across the Mediterranean you can find lots of different skin colours and customs.

      Nobility and their favoured travelled extensively, skilled tradespeople would undertake elaborate pilgramidge if they could afford it all the way to Jerusalem. Even serfs got to go on pilgrimage although usually not to Jerusalem but to other cathedrals.

      Stop with this ahistorical nonsense. Maybe someone in the British isles might not have much contact of the greater world but the HRE? Spain? Italy? The eastern Roman empire? Of fucking course they did.

    • алсааас [she/they]@lemmy.dbzer0.comM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      You know that… Christianity developed in the Roman Empire? The Middle East (more exactly Palestine and Syria. Which were larger that today’s counterparts) wasn’t some magical place where giants lived, but a province of said Empire