Sjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agoThe value of xsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square138fedilinkarrow-up11.13Karrow-down121
arrow-up11.11Karrow-down1imageThe value of xsh.itjust.worksSjmarf@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.works · 1 month agomessage-square138fedilink
minus-squarecelsiustimeline@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down2·edit-230 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squarecucumber_sandwich@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoBut it’s not unsolvable, just a misleading drawing…
minus-squarePM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-21 month agoIt’s not unsolvable at all. The answer is x=135°. The triangles simply aren’t drawn to scale; The line between them isn’t a 90° angle, (even though it is drawn that way) because it is not specifically marked as 90° with a square angle mark.
deleted by creator
But it’s not unsolvable, just a misleading drawing…
It’s not unsolvable at all. The answer is x=135°. The triangles simply aren’t drawn to scale; The line between them isn’t a 90° angle, (even though it is drawn that way) because it is not specifically marked as 90° with a square angle mark.