• Arkouda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    1 month ago

    I try not to judge, but I am going to make an exception in this case.

    Bad parents plain and simple. That child deserved better.

      • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        1 month ago

        Some people aren’t educated in these things.

        Tell that to the dead child who deserved better than ignorant parents that didn’t even care enough to do a Google search.

        Ignorance is not an excuse.

        • Auli@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          It isn’t protocol for the hospitals to give the shot for a bat in the room. Probably would have gone to the hospital and been turned away.
          And it’s easy after the fact to say oh should have done this. As they say hindsight is 20/20.

          • nyan@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            Yeah, the takeaway from this is, “We need some public service announcements about bats,” and “The healthcare protocol needs to be updated so that a shot is given if a bat is found in a room where someone was asleep or otherwise may have been bitten without being conscious of it,” not “These are bad parents.”

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            It isn’t protocol for the hospitals to give the shot for a bat in the room. Probably would have gone to the hospital and been turned away.

            Or they would have gone to the hospital and had the Doctor find the bite/scratch that led to the rabies infection.

            And it’s easy after the fact to say oh should have done this. As they say hindsight is 20/20.

            Would you be saying this if the child was left in a hot car? Unattended in the bath? Found unsecured chemicals under the sink?

            As I said, ignorance is no excuse for a dead child.

        • Nik282000@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ignorance is not an excuse.

          If no one has ever told them that some bats carry rabies how would they know to Google anything when they find a bat in the house? It’s not something that is taught in school and I’ve never seen or heard a PSA talking about it in Ontario.

          • Arkouda@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            If no one ever told them the dangers of hot cars, would you be arguing this if the child died in one? If no one ever told them to not leave a child unattended in the bath, would you be arguing this when the child drowned? If no one ever told them to properly secure chemicals, and the child drinks them would you still be arguing for ignorance?

            Lots of things aren’t taught in schools. Many don’t have wide reaching PSA’s.

            None of that changes the fact that a child died from a very preventable illness because the parents didn’t think.

            Ignorance is not an excuse for a dead child.