She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    TBH statements like this are hurting her odds more than helping. Everybody on board already knows those things about her, nothing about her policies.

    • pyre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      American people are notoriously uninterested in policy when it comes to presidents in the general election. they elected W (with a minority) because they felt they could have a beer with him. they elected Obama for change, him being smart, a good orator, relatively young and black was a huge contrast to everything W was. they elected TFG (with a minority) because they thought he was an outsider. they elected Biden because he wasn’t TFG.

      but yes they should promote Harris’ policies more because they aren’t bad.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        At least some of use do care. While I’m voting against Trump regardless, I’d rather vote for someone. If I do talk politics, I’d rather try to sell the benefits of a candidate, rather than what a disaster another candidate would be

        • pyre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve always argued for that. like, usually if a party is running on being against someone or some group (this goes for parties demonizing gay people or immigrants or whatever minority as well) then i assume they’re not going to do anything for me, otherwise they’d be running on that.

          unfortunately in two party systems it becomes one party running against a minority and the other party running on not being as bad as the first party.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      4 months ago

      I think its less about changing the odds, and more about giving a needed morale boost to two minority groups long oppressed by politics in general.

      • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        You should probably be worried about our odds at this point in the game. We can celebrate her traits when she’s in.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Oh I’ve stopped worrying about the odds, pretty sure we are permafucked. I’d like to be wrong and it’s not going to keep me me from voting blue down the panel.

          Just that I know from my own experience cultural racism and misogyny is still a ridiculously powerful force, even among progressives.

          And you are giving the public way too much credit. Almost no one really cares about accomplishments when it really boils down to it. It is all about how a person makes one feel, and that is largely informed by media that is notably NOT them enacting their policies.

          Yes she has a good list of positive accomplishments, and has demonstrated her skill at statesmanship consistently to those who follow such things, but that isn’t your average voter. Or even your average swing voter.

          There isn’t nearly as much cultural awareness of her as there is of a certain pants-shitting spraytanned twice impeached and 34 time felon, and people are gullible and easily swayed.

          I want to be wrong because I in at least two groups of the people that cheetolini’s camp squads want to come after first, but I’ve already been acting on plans to get my family out of the country for the last 8 hours and I don’t plan on being on my home soil longer than it takes to vote in November and get on a plane.

          • Wilzax@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            If you want to be wrong, shut up and help get literally anyone capable of the job into the oval office before Mr. Impeached for Insurrection gets another go at it

          • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            Nobody asked. Maybe go share your pathetic surrender in your own comment thread instead of attaching it as a reply to mine? Get some better feedback that way.

      • Rayspekt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        People of colour and what’s the second? Women aren’t a minority if you meant that.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          In politics they certainly are, and even when they reach high position they face greater hurdles and prejudices than their male counterparts. You don’t need to be tiny in number to be marginalized inhumanely.