• Zeke@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    4 months ago

    Honestly, we’re basically just voting for Kamala when we vote for Biden.

      • APassenger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is what I’ve been thinking too. Cognitive decline isn’t necessarily fatal. Nancy Reagan used astrologers because she was lost and trying to keep up appearances.

        Dunno what Jill/Joe will do. But if he was inclined to step down, I don’t see home doing it for a few years.

        • Madison420@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          If it’s Parkinson’s as alleged then there’s no real reason to freak out, moreso because the cabinet does a substantial amount of the leg work anyway. Realistically so long as other leaders respect and understand him everything is fine and this is just more media doom fabrication.

          • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            The Parkinson’s thing was made up.

            Yes, a Parkinson’s team visited the White House medical center, but not for Biden - the New York Post just published that out of all the people who work in the White House, it must have been Biden they were there to see, and the New York Times then republished the story because they are equivalent to the Post now apparently.

            • I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Who, other than Biden, would a Parkinson’s team go to the White House to see, rather than the affected person going to see them?

              ESPECIALLY given what they had to know was suspicious optics of the team going there. What sort of emergency would a random person at the white house have to have for a team to show up there despite the questions it would bring?

              There’s only a handful of people who would be at the white house, unfeasible to leave, and has their movements in public tracked at all times. Biden is on that short list.

              • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, makes sense. Just aiming to correct the record that yes, the claim is not just incorrect but New York Post-level propaganda, as far as I’m aware (which is an informative thing to keep in mind whenever you see someone repeating it).

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      i wish that was a guarantee; i would vote for biden in that case and i wouldn’t have to hold my nose as tightly to do so.

      • Zeke@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        If we split the votes between third party and democrat again, we’re done for. We’ve already lost this race. Hard stuck democrats won’t be convinced to vote third party. There won’t be enough votes to win. Unfortunately, this is a democrat or fascist dictatorship vote.