• Eheran@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That is your argument? Paywall? And now it is just easier access, not actually some kind of different material all together as you claimed? There are things like Scihub, let alone any student in any university has essentially access to all papers anyway? How is that in any way anything special?

    I also don’t get why you bring me into the discussion. Keep it about the topic at hand, you know nothing about me. It is irrelevant whether I read papers or not.

    • hamtooth@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you are confused. I never implied it was different material. Blocking you now.

      • Eheran@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        “access to totally different electronic information services” “has better info than any private individual.”

        I think I misunderstood you regarding the different information (did not notice the word “services”).

        In any case, any random person has access to that information. A doctor will be more likely to read such papers and will also be more qualified to interpret them compared to the average of the population. However, anecdotal evidence is still irrelevant. And so are titles. All that matters are the arguments. If some little kid has arguments against something a Nobel prize winning Professor says… then so be it.