• stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      It doesn’t say anything about 18th century human rights philosophers either but it’s full of that too.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yes. It is. It’s assumed because that’s how the legal theories at the time it was written went.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              It’s clear that you think that it was written in a vacuum without any historical context. That’s not how history works. It’s unclear why you are stuck on this particular hill.

                  • blazera@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    5
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Oh ive learned plenty. That the constitution has nothing in it to support common law.