Surprisingly based from ND, to be completely honest

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Although I agree with this in principle, it ignores the reality of why officeholders get re-elected into their 70s and 80s. It’s not because voters like them in particular, but it’s because they are the “safe” option. They increasingly become nobody’s first choice but there is often no logical alternative. Incumbents are also much more able to raise more campaign money than their opponents and thus have a large advantage just because they can blast their message more often.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I agree that the first-past-the-post voting system should be replaced with something better, but at the same time, complaining that people should participate more in primary elections is not a solution to the problem. A solution would be implement mandatory voting. That’s not a popular solution (and you probably personally hate the idea), but it is a solution. I am not advocating for it.

          There’s also just a sense of election fatigue. The US has a general election every other year which is far more often than most other countries.

          At the same time—