A new report has assessed the feasibility of deploying small modular nuclear reactors to meet increasing energy demands around the world. The findings don't look so good for this particular form of energy production.

[T]he report’s executive summary certainly gets to the heart of their findings.

“The rhetoric from small modular reactor (SMR) advocates is loud and persistent: This time will be different because the cost overruns and schedule delays that have plagued large reactor construction projects will not be repeated with the new designs,” says the report. “But the few SMRs that have been built (or have been started) paint a different picture – one that looks startlingly similar to the past. Significant construction delays are still the norm and costs have continued to climb.”

  • PriorityMotif@lemmy.worldEnglish
    32·
    6 months ago

    I don’t think the military should show a profit. That would just bring back colonialism. Although, they do make a hefty profit for defense contractors.

    • Zron@lemmy.worldEnglish
      82·
      6 months ago

      The fact that this was your take away is concerning.

      No government service should have to show a profit. If it’s an essential service, then it needs to be done. The only time money should come into it is in regular audits to ensure the budget is being used efficiently.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      2·
      6 months ago

      Yup, the military’s purpose is to not be needed. It should be strong enough to deter attack and assist diplomacy (carrot and stick), and no larger. Our (US) military is bigger than that, so it gets used in place of diplomacy.