• secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Statistics, especially statistics by those in power, are often not accurate. How can people know that this is accurate data and how would it even be possible to get accurate data in a situation like this? I also looked at the numbers again, and although the worst curves are flattening, there’s also a lot of really awful facts in that PDF. Is this the least cruel way Israel could fight Hamas or is unnecessary cruelty being implemented? Another poster said they may be using phosphorous. Is that true?

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      That plays both ways. If the data isn’t reliable why are people able to accuse Israel of genocide?

      You admit lack of reliable evidence. It’s very disturbing that accusations of genocide are being levied when there is a lack of evidence.

      • secretlyaddictedtolinux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s not actually true. I didn’t admit a lack of reliable evidence of genocide but just questioned how data collected in a war zone has such precise numbers when there are probably epistemological problems with determining numbers. I’m incredibly politically and historically ignorant on this conflict and would not, at my current level of knowledge, make a blanket conclusion about whether genocide can be concluded or not concluded based on reliable evidence.