• FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s always bugged me that people who say that don’t actually know the definition of natural.

    (And for those of you who don’t, it’s “existent in nature”, which homosexuality definitely is.)

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Moot point lmao classic religious take “let me just muddy your waters real quick call it magic, convince everyone I’m an ethereal, supernatural being and preach about general purpose rules and morals which would prevent the planet from destroying itself.

        Good luck out there man, you’re gonna need it in the coming age of science. Like it or not, real “God” is self-evident and proveable - Her name is Science

        • Captain_Waffles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Uhhh, I think you replied to the wrong comment, or severely misunderstood my comment. I’m an agnostic atheist and I was making fun of the religious argument that “unnatural=bad and natural=good”. How is it a moot point that natural does not necessarily mean good for you? Good luck out there man, you’re gonna need it since you are making massive leaps based on something that exists only in your head. Take a chill pill, you clearly need it.

          Oh, and science is not my God cause I don’t worship it.