The Czech government is investing in nuclear energy as a means to decarbonisation.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/6BxG0

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    You linked the same study that doesn’t even pose the hypothesis for which energy source is more green. All that study did was linked high GDP with lower emissions overall, and low GDP with higher emissions overall and suggested that nuclear and renewables are incompatible, which is pure bullshit. Look at Norway, Sweden, France, Paraguay, Iceland, and Nepal who manages ~90% of total energy production via renewables and nuclear.

    If countries want to reach 100% renewable energy throughout the full year in-house, they will have to use multiple sources due to how cyclical it can be. At least until energy storage gets completely reinvented.

    • Hugohase@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sometimed I am astonished that people post in a forum without being able to comprehend text

      We find that larger-scale national nuclear attachments do not tend to associate with significantly lower carbon emissions while renewables do.

      • BrikoX@lemmy.zipOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s you who can’t read. The whole correlation is flawed by design, hence ignored by me. If you read the limitations section, they explain how they lack specific data for a comprehensive comparison, so they aggregate the data and ignore “economic costs, integrated resource planning, reliability, lifecycle impacts, risk profiles, waste management, and ecological, political and security impacts”. Which are important factors to ignore, which completely changes the results when incorporated by other studies.