• Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Good rule, those should be web addresses, not apps. Or even better, native applications rather than web apps, but it does depend on the context.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Eh… why? More to the point, it’s not mentioned anywhere in their guidelines, it was made up on the spot by the fella doing the code review.

        • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          They are inefficient and bloated.

          And personally, I prefer good reasoning over good rules. If something comes up that is a bad idea but there’s no existing rule against it, the rules should be changed to address it. As long as the reasoning is sound, I think it’s a good thing, especially when we’re talking about something like a software distribution platform as opposed to say laws that determine freedom or imprisonment.

          • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            Also if you’ve made a web app, let it be installed as a web app. Both FF and Chrome let you install web apps in one click.

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Inefficient and bloated describes 90% of all apps I’ve ever seen, regardless of technology used, so I fail to see your point.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        Not WebView, but a so-called TWA, aka Trusted Web Activity, a features specifically designed to wrap PWAs and give them full-blown app capabilities.

        • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          What additional capabilities does that give the app beyond using Firefox or Chrome to install it as a PWA?

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you really want to have it available on F-Droid, you can always put it in a separate repository. So I can see it being annoying that they reject it from their repo, but there’s still a reasonable path forward.

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Well, I have the app on Google Play store, which was originally meant to be the alternative, now it’s the main store.