• looz@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Software I’m used to is easier for me than software I have no experience with.”

      What a fantastic insight.

      • LogarithmicCamel@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You would imagine this to be obvious, but people who are used to Photoshop or Reddit complain all the time that Gimp or Lemmy are not as intuitive, as the other comments fully demonstrate.

      • Comment105@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        GIMP being free to just download from their site, and still being used far less (even by novices) than paid or pirated Photoshop really tells the whole story.

        The average lemmy user compared to the general public is just far more used to trading away quality to stay with Free and Open-Source Software, to the point of sometimes apparently being blind to the mainstream option’s appeal.

          • Comment105@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Intuitiveness is objective and measurable, and I’m very certain that Photoshop would demolish GIMP if a test was done.

            • Dangdoggo@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              “intuitiveness is objective and measurable” is such a hilarious thing to say. Like yes it’s possible to measure how quickly people can come to understand an app but to say that, therefore, we have an objective understanding of ‘intuitiveness’ and can say “Hamburger menu instead of kebab menu here??? That is O B J E C T I V E L Y unintuitive” is sooo fucking silly.

            • Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Not really objective in real life. There is no abstract human in a vacuum, everyone has some previous knowledge and biases. If you ever had to train a grown up how to use a mouse and the ever illusive concept of double click, you know that even with some level of skeuomorphism there is a trouble at grasping new concepts, and if we go into more complicated territory, all bets are off. Maybe for a blank slate without any prior experience existing in society and operating tools, there are some high level abstract concepts, but for a real person, intuitiveness basically means “looks familiar to a something that I personally have seen before”

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Something being free to download doesn’t help if the paid software is so ingrained into culture, both popular and professional, that it practically has a monopoly. If you want to get work as an artist working with other people, you’ll want to learn the industry standard, not a niche program.

          That’s all aside from whether gimp actually is or isn’t better, I just think the argument make no sense.

    • PeWu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I am the same. I tried Photoshop and bazillion of tools didn’t help when making a simple picture, while GIMP could do that with relatively easier steps.

      Edit: grammar, apologies.

      • Quik@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        This seems true though, Gimp uses the same (fairly complex) tools for most thing Photoshop has an own tool for. Have to commit I’m not that experienced with PS though