• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Non public should be more efficient from the labor cost savings of not having to file all the sec documents quarterly and legal costs of following public company regulations.

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Not to mention that an obsession with increasing share price is massively distracting and self-defeating.

        • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          ·
          8 months ago

          Public companies focus on short term profit to keep share holders happy. Private companies can actually focus on long term profit, especially if it’s at the expense of some short term profit.

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 months ago

            Or they can choose not to focus on profit at all. Probably most people with an ownership stake in Valve are fabulously rich now. Maybe they just want to focus on interesting R&D now.

            Theoretically there’s a benefit to a publicly traded company that since a lot of your financials are visible to everyone and people get to “vote” by buying and selling shares, there’s a sense in which you can get feedback on how well you’re running the company that you don’t get when it’s private. But, as Reddit’s “wall street bets” and “superstonk” subreddits show, a lot of investors are morons.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        This isn’t totally true. Private companies can still have shareholders that demand info. Their aren’t the same level of regulations, but it’s not nothing.