I hear people say that about Nextcloud often, which is part of why I haven’t bothered setting it up yet.

Is there a technical reason why it’s slow and clunky? Any problematic choices with how it was built?

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    Nextcloud is slow and clunky if you run it on a banana.

    Run it on a “normal” server and everything is smooth.

    • muelltonne@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yeah, and don’t pretend that comparable software like Google Drive, Sharepoint or Dropbox is faster.

      • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        I compare it to a samba or (s)ftp share. I wish it was similar in speed and ease of use.

        It’s become better since I migrated over to PostgreSQL. But it’s still not great.

        • dust_accelerator@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          PostgreSQL is definitely a boost to performance, especially if you offload the DB to a dedicated server (depending on load, can even be a cluster)

          Nevertheless, it probably has much to do with how it’s deployed and how many proxies are in front of it, and/or VPN. If you have large numbers of containers and small CPU/low memory hardware, and either running everything on one machine or have some other limitations, it’ll be slow.

          Admittedly, I’m not very familiar with the codebase, but I feel Apache isn’t improving the speed either. Not exactly sure how PHP is nowadays with concurrency and async, but generally a microservice type architecture is nice because you can add more workers/instances wherever a bottleneck emerges.

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Dropbox is faster.

        Dropbox is A LOT faster than NC ever was. But if you want to talk about speeds and reliability then use Synching. Add FileBrowser if you want to have a WebUI on a central “server” to access all your files and you’ll be 100x better than the garbage that NC offers.

    • jr52@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      I tried running nextcloud on an allwinner RiscV chip and it was dead slow lol

    • rambos@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Im running it on celeron g3930 and its great. I did remove most extensions (this was the trick I believe) and using MySQL. I have only 2 users tho

    • TCB13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Run it on a “normal” server and everything is smooth.

      Sure until you try with a high end 12 core CPU on NVMe storage all kinds of caching, redis etc. and you find you it doesn’t perform particularly better.

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        It runs fine in a VM with a few cores, 4gb of ram and Sata SSDs

        The entire Nextcloud folder is on a network share as well.