smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agoThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square107fedilinkarrow-up1613arrow-down18cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
arrow-up1605arrow-down1external-linkThe HDMI Forum rejected AMD's open source HDMI 2.1 implementationwww.gamingonlinux.comsmileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 months agomessage-square107fedilinkcross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zip
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·9 months agoThere’s some really high bandwidth stuff that USB-C isn’t rated for. You have to really press the limits, though. Something like 4k + 240Hz + HDR.
minus-squareABCDE@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoThat doesn’t even seem so unreasonable. Is that the limit though? My cable puts a gigabyte a second down it so I wouldn’t imagine that would hit the limit.
minus-squareGeniusIsme@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·9 months agoIt is trivial arithmetic: 4.52403840*2160 ≈ 9 GB/ s. Not even close. Even worse, that cable will struggle to get ordinary 60hz 4k delivered.
There’s some really high bandwidth stuff that USB-C isn’t rated for. You have to really press the limits, though. Something like 4k + 240Hz + HDR.
That doesn’t even seem so unreasonable. Is that the limit though? My cable puts a gigabyte a second down it so I wouldn’t imagine that would hit the limit.
It is trivial arithmetic: 4.52403840*2160 ≈ 9 GB/ s. Not even close. Even worse, that cable will struggle to get ordinary 60hz 4k delivered.