State representative Ashley Aune is trying to fight it, but doesn’t have high hopes.

Something you might have picked up on over the last several weeks/years/centuries is that there are a disturbing number of people in power who will go to great lengths to control women in America. Not convinced? Thinking of citing the fact that in some countries, women are stoned to death (as though that makes what happens here okay)? Then we’d like to make you aware of a law in Missouri that says pregnant women cannot get a divorce finalized if they’re pregnant—even if said pregnant people are victims of domestic violence.

  • kromem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It’s a bit annoying that they wrote it up so literally decades after he was dead.

    Dude was also allegedly regularly referring to death and the afterlife using marriage metaphors of bridegrooms and bridal suites.

    But yeah, the idea divorce is impossible had to do with actual marriage and not the whole ‘dying’ part.

    (Though I suppose the sect that believed a dead body came back as opposed to the sects that denied physical resurrection would have preferred interpreting it as referring to actual marriage and not death…)

    • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a bit annoying that they wrote it up so literally decades after he was dead.

      It took a while to create a myth from scratch. Go read the early Batman and Superman comics, you can see how they struggled. In any case the restricted divorce rules probably came from Paul and the author of Mark’s pathetic attempts to read the OT Song of songs and Zeke 29.

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        How do you think Song of Songs or Ezekiel 29 relate to the divorce prohibition?

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          The erotica was reimagined and partially rewritten as an analogy for the relationship between Israel and God. In that context the idea of divorce becomes a seperation from God. Paul is not a fan of divorce unless of course the partner wasn’t a member of the church i.e. they were commiting adultery against God. He repurposed baptism to make it part of the marriage to Christ which wasn’t a big leap since Judaism already had a ritual like baptism prior to getting married. Then he flattened humanity, telling people that all were equally the same to the son of god making it acceptable for higher class, lower class, males, slaves, and all ethnic groups to be married to the same person.

          All these vague ideas merged later when the Gospel writers needed to fill in the plot.