• ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    9 months ago

    Like I said, that’s your area(and thats 4g from the att. Not the much faster 5g). Doesn’t change that you can look up coverage data from any source you can find. 5g coverage is completely dominated by t-mobile for nation wide coverage right now.

    Now cell coverage for 3/4g and just keeping cell signal; Verizon all day.

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Yes, my state is far larger than yours, so that may be a difference. We only have 5G coverage in major cities and along interstates.

        • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, but I know what state I’m in. You’re not in Alaska or Texas or you wouldn’t be making these fantastic claims, so by process of elimination, you do not live in a larger state than I.

            • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, why would I engage with that sort of disingenuous nonsense. We’re talking about cell coverage. Area matters. Period. Full statewide 5G coverage may be possible in a tiny state, but it starts to get bad and then abysmal as states become larger and are mostly rural.

              • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                Why do you possibly think that a states size has anything to do with where they place cell towers? Cities barely even care about what state they sit in. Hell, Kansas city is in two states. Cell towers are just put in populated areas. Not populated states.