Scientific American

  • PumpkinSkink@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    I notice a fair number of people suggesting that it might give incentive to corrupt the public media outlet, or that it may be biased toward the government funding it… and yeah… that’s probably true to one degree or another. But, that said, I think we all should take a moment and think honestly about bias in media. All media is biased, especially the ones that claim they’re unbiased. Just because it’s privately funded doesn’t make it any less succeptible to corruption or bias. Indeed one of the biggest complains about our news is that the majority of media companies are owned and operated by, what is it, six(?) companies, and we know they all mislead people regularly on issues that affect them. Instead of focusing on removing bias from media, we should all be more diligent about being skeptical of the author’s presentation of the media we consume regardless of funding source, and particularly when it is selling is info that we agree with and that angers us.

    • quicksand@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes, it’s important to believe nothing and criticize everything. But in this day in age, I’d rather trust the publicly funded stuff than the privately funded media, due to the amount of scrutiny