• racemaniac@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I kind of get these kind of comics, but isn’t the reality that all of humanity is still in a competition with eachother, and doing all the wrong things gives you more power than doing all the right things, so that’s what continues happening.

    In these climate debates the reality is that it’s a global chicken on the road, we all go toward self annihilation at a steady pace, and the first who flinches and tries to take action will get taken advantage of and ruined. So it’s slooooooow talks about doing tiny things and kind of maybe a bit cooperating while noone really wants to, because any advantage they can get over another country will be taken advantage of…

    Maybe i’m a bit too pessimistic, but it’s my assumption that things work like that, and then all this bullshit suddenly makes sense >_<…

    • Ilflish@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Slightly more complicated than that. It’s also that some countries are way more affected by changes then others. Sure everyone uses fossil fuels but only specific countries export it so you are basically asking a country to cripple itself for you. Same when people suggest we should just not cut down the rainforests. In both cases it would likely be done if other countries paid for it. But right now it’s what you say as well as asking people to handicap themselves

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Well it’s more of tragedy of the commons situation than a game of chicken.

      How many times do you hear someone say “why should we change if CHINA is going to keep on polluting the air?”

      I just counter with, “who’s the leaders of the world? Is China the world leader and we can’t doing anything until they do it first?”