AFAIK the sexual assault allegation was proven with a proponderence of evidence in civil court only. I guess the criminal case already passed statute of limitation.
This is why sexual assault, as this includes rape. But rape is a specific criminal thing and since he has not been criminally convicted he is only a sexual predator and assaulter… not a rapist. I’m explaining not agreeing btw.
And civil court only leads to money not jail time.
Edit: can anyone downvoting this please explain? I don’t understand, I was merely trying to explain the process and the current situation.
Yup, although looking at all the sexual assault allegations we have seen in the past years from long ago. People that where abused at a very young age and/or by people that held a position of authority over them… the time should be longer.
Time should also not tick away as long as the victim is a minor. Ie. If a victim was 13 at the time of the assault the time should be extended with at least 5 years… if not more.
Ofc there is a question if there should be a statute of limitation at all for these types of crimes. Proof is hard enough as it is.
He raped her. That last judge went out of their way to clarify that point. He should be in prison. But monetary compensation as well…
AFAIK the sexual assault allegation was proven with a proponderence of evidence in civil court only. I guess the criminal case already passed statute of limitation.
This is why sexual assault, as this includes rape. But rape is a specific criminal thing and since he has not been criminally convicted he is only a sexual predator and assaulter… not a rapist. I’m explaining not agreeing btw.
And civil court only leads to money not jail time.
Edit: can anyone downvoting this please explain? I don’t understand, I was merely trying to explain the process and the current situation.
You’re right, of course. It’s why victims of traumatic crimes should have longer to report their attackers and receive justice.
Yup, although looking at all the sexual assault allegations we have seen in the past years from long ago. People that where abused at a very young age and/or by people that held a position of authority over them… the time should be longer.
Time should also not tick away as long as the victim is a minor. Ie. If a victim was 13 at the time of the assault the time should be extended with at least 5 years… if not more.
Ofc there is a question if there should be a statute of limitation at all for these types of crimes. Proof is hard enough as it is.
deleted by creator
Quetzlcoatls were not known for their ability to read I guess
I think this is a very willful misinterpretation of their comment.
You reading the same thing? They were explaining the situation, legally. Not logically nor factually, but legally what is going on.
homie just learned the word “sealioning” and is really excited to use it
*You’re