Computer scientist shows how to tamper with Georgia voting machine, in election security trial: “All it takes is five seconds and a Bic pen.”::An expert witness for plaintiffs seeking to bar Georgia’s touchscreen voting machines showed a crowded courtroom how he could tamper with election res

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    It scares the shit out of me that the US has so fully adopted voting machines. They are incredibly unreliable and it would be so easy for a bad actor to hack an election. Especially with FPTP, it would be so easy to goose the numbers in a couple of key districts and swing an election for whomever you wanted to win. It’s almost definitely already happened several times.

    In Canada we still do voting on paper, but then the votes are counted electronically and the paper copy is kept for recounting by a human later if needed. It’s sort of the best of both worlds.

    • evatronic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s not everywhere.

      States that do vote by mail are just like you describe – paper ballots collected and counted by computer, with the paper preserved.

    • fubarx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      Not all states are fully electronic. Many districts (including mine) are run on paper ballots that are then scanned.

      I would be more concerned about the upstream tabulation systems. The possibility of making bulk changes is much more harmful than tampering with single voting machines.

      There was a mad dash to electronic voting after the Bush v Gore hanging chad fiasco. A lot of people are still focusing on the voting machines vs. the integrity of centralized tabulation systems.