• porgamrer@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Honestly this is usually bad advice nowadays, for a bunch of reasons:

    1. Modern allocators do the same thing as object pooling internally, usually faster. They rarely interact with the OS.

    2. A GC will do things like zero old memory on another thread, unlike a custom clearing function in a scripting language.

    3. Object pooling breaks the generational hypothesis that most modern garbage collectors are designed around; it can actually make performance much worse. Most GCs love short-lived objects.

    4. Object pools increase code complexity and are very error prone; when you add a new field you have to remember to clear it in the pool.

    5. If you are in a non-GC language you probably want something “data-oriented” like a slotmap, not a pool of object allocations.

    Having said all that, it still all depends on the language/VM you’re targeting. The guy in the video clearly benchmarked his use case.

    • JakenVeina@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      The guy in the video clearly benchmarked his use case.

      This is the real answer in almost any scenario. Don’t optimize without hard evidence.