• queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    There’s a fundamental contradiction between the capitalist reach for yield and environmental regulations.

    In the long run, not having environmental regulations is bad for the market. In the short run, though, businesses can make a lot of money very quickly when they’re not regulated. This tension has lead to deadlock in every capitalist nation on Earth and it’s not getting better.

    • galloog1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We may disagree on these points but it should be obvious that there’s plenty of opposition to your preferred system in the majority of the modern world. That’s why insisting on radical change as a precursor to action is counter productive to actual mitigation of climate effects. Even if you are right about the system being less effective at environmentalism, you are hiring the efforts to do something about the issue now and drastic action is needed.

      That same tension existed in regards to national parks, CFCs, water management, wildlife management, waste management, and many other issues. What makes you think climate is any different other than bigger?

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That same tension existed in regards to national parks, CFCs, water management, wildlife management, waste management, and many other issues. What makes you think climate is any different other than bigger?

        All of that was implemented while the USSR was still around. Without the boogyman around to scare capitalists into reforming themselves and implementing sustainable business practices, they won’t do it. That’s why we’ve been seeing all those Cold War era reforms eroded one after another, there’s just no need to placate the masses.

        Maybe climate change can be the boogyman that the USSR was. It doesn’t seem to be working, though.

        • galloog1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think it was the USSR that was the motivation behind it, at least the ones during that period. It might’ve been more the hatred of cities, cancer, disease, and pests respectively. I will admit, giving the USSR credit for the environmental movement in the US is a creative and new one for me. You are off by about 25 years there for the beginning but it’s close.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            The USSR deserves credit for pretty much every good idea the US has ever had since the New Deal.

            And now that the USSR is gone, everything good the US has ever done is being eroded by fascists.

            Makes you think!