• RunawayFixer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s reddit though. How can we know how many of those people are real?

    Even before the Reddit app debacle, reddit made very questionable decisions and if you went to look at that discussion at a later date, the answers that were artificially boosted to the top (this depended on how you went to look at the site, it seemed a lot less in old reddit) seemed as fake as a fake Amazon review, as if reddit was astroturfing their own website.

    The change that broke reddit for me was this: https://old.reddit.com/r/blog/comments/s71g03/announcing_blocking_updates/?limit=500 I have no way of looking at the thread without using old.reddit, so I don’t know if it still looks as astroturfed as it did back then.

    • KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reedits motto was “fake it till you make it” and we know that disinformation campaigns are also rife on the platform so there is every reason to believe a single entity is behind these accounts, whether it be Reddit itself or a third party.

      That said, there is kinda a sunk cost fallacy thing too in the sense that people have decided Reddit is “their platform” of choice and people will defend it like a diehard sports fan does for right or wrong. Just like in politics which is just as weird too.