• Nolegjoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Whether you like it or not, the UK still requires oil and gas in its energy mix, and will continue to require it for another decade or so. The options are to ship it in from the middle east, US, or Russia. Or, we can source it ourselves from the North Sea. Getting it ourselves will actually have less CO2 emissions as we won’t be shipping it halfway across the planet.

    • Tenebris Nox@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not if the country went on “war footing” about the climate catastrophe and took measures to ensure that budgets were redirected into eco-investments (eg. stop spending £3 billion a year on the maintenance of 50 trident missiles). Radical investments in things like tidal power, completely free public transport etc. Where there’s a will there’s a way.

    • Ruchbah@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      That is assuming that by extracting it ourselves we are at least equally reducing how much is being extracted elsewhere…. Which obviously isn’t the case. This will take carbon that’s currently trapped under the ground and release it into the atmosphere.

      They are killing us for profit & votes

    • Badtouchspez@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Whether you like it or not, the UK still requires oil and gas in its energy mix, and will continue to require it for another decade or so.

      Tbh who’s fault is that. There was plenty of warning and time for the UK to decarbonise. She chose not to.