• nodester@partizle.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re trying to juice up their stats for advertisers. More registered users = more surveillance capitalism.

  • howler@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is hilarious. The biggest inconvenience this will cause, is people asking “can you post a screenshot? I dont use Twitter.”

    • grahamsz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      It is kind of a disaster for emergencies. Twitter is the defacto social network whenever any disaster strikes round here, the sheer volume of people, emergency services and the versatility of hashtags make it great for that.

  • comicallycluttered@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol. “Town Square”. Hah.

    Honestly, thank you, Elon. Now I’m not even tempted to visit that toxic hellscape echo chamber of awful shit.

    Bastard somehow did something that’ll probably have a more positive effect on my mental health.

    This is a net positive (for me), but it’s still fucking dumb, and his fault. “Too many sites were scraping us :(” Yeah, dude, that’s what happens when you pull the “API is only for the wealthy now” nonsense.

    I swear, this could be prescient, actually. Could easily see Huffman pulling this shit within the next few weeks. (Lol, I wouldn’t put it past him to do it tomorrow.)

    The advertisers must love this.

    • NotSteve_@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      He kind of already has implemented something like this. If you ever try and load a mobile reddit thread in your browser, you’re greeted with a download the app-wall like 50% or more of the time.

      it’s better in the app

    • r00ty@kbin.life
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Watching him destroy that site is quite astonishing. I’ve never had an account with twitter. It never appealed to me. Making it a requirement to have an account to even see content isn’t going to convince me to sign up.

      Since many companies use twitter as their mouthpiece on the internet. I wonder how they’re going to react when they’re now only able to engage with registered users. I’d be surprised if this works out well for the company to be honest.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was just over on the r/worldnews livethread on the Ukraine war and the embedded tweets were showing up just fine. I’d actually forgotten about this thread and tried clicking on one for further details, and got the “you’re not logged in” notification.

      Ironically, I had a Twitter account years ago that I created purely because something I was doing at the time required one for login purposes. I never used it and I can only assume it was deleted a few months back when Twitter said they were purging “inactive” accounts. I’m certainly not creating a new one now.

      actually start doing their fucking jobs as journalists and write out the content of the tweet in their own words.

      They’ve got ChatGPT for that now.

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      They should use Twitter for what it is, not as the main source of information. I’m so sick of it. Use Twitter as an additional channel to promote your stuff, chat with people maybe. But goddammit, don’t use Twitter as the main channel (just like how it was with Facebook years back, spit).

      • thejml@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        While I agree that using Twitter for your news isn’t cool, if a corp or a politician or someone tweets something on there, their tweet counts as quote and referencing that is an important part of journalism.

  • Elbrond@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well, that makes it even easier to never visit Twitter again. Right now I was sometimes tempted to follow a link and see what it was about, but I’ll be happy to quit that habbit too.

    • MagicShel@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Right? It’s annoying but I’ve seen a few people aggregate news to a bunch of Twitter links. Now they won’t be able to do that and engagement will go down even further.

  • esaru@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Twitter users can’t post to the general public anymore. Their posts are visible to users logged into Twitter only. That should render Twitter useless to whoever wants to post something to people on the Internet. I wonder what journalists, companies, or politicians think about it.

  • Cat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    These social media giants seem to be self destructing themselves on purpose.

    • kmkz_ninja@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Seriously though, what is causing all of these various media platforms to ramp up the attacks on their users so obviously? Reddit blocking apps, Twitter login-hiding posts, Google shutting down adblockers. Is it coordinated? Does it just make sense to make a rush for money when every company is doing the same?

      • morry040@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A lot of the tech companies were slammed by investors over the last two years for missing their earnings and many of them are still struggling to go back to 2021 optimistic growth rates. The layoffs last year have also cost them a lot of their best talent, so the quality of innovation, decision making, and execution has suffered. You are now left with a bunch of older executives who never really understood that it was their younger talent that was the core of their company’s success, so they fall back on older methods like increasing prices and cutting costs to try and lead the board / shareholders into thinking that their ridiculous executive salary packages are somehow justified.

  • Kuroneko@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Welp, this kills Twitter for me permanently. I closed my account after Mush took it over but sometimes I’d check out tweets and replies my Discord friends would share. Big tech just keeps shooting itself in the foot lately.

  • Disgustoid@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s certainly one way to begin a social media detox along with Reddit’s idiocy over third party apps. This will make it much easier to ignore Twitter since I deleted my account there and have no intention of signing up again just to view tweets.

  • TerryTPlatypus@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can already tell you this is negatively affecting furries. A lot of people use Twitter as a platform for furry art and discussion. Now that Twitter can’t be accessed by the public, furry art can’t be spread as easily theough embed, and this hurts furry artists in the long run.

    Actually, more generally this could hurt artists period.

  • African_Grey@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Mastodon is better anyway. I deleted Twitter ages ago when Musk took over. It’s amazing how many people have stayed there despite how much he’s shit all over the userbase. He makes Spez look like a saint.

    • Kaldo@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mastodon might be “better” but it’s in a completely different league if it’s missing 99% people I actually care about following on twitter. On mastodon the feed is just random people talking about their personal stuff and misusing hashtags, and usually when you bring this up the answer is “well duh, mastodon is not supposed to be twitter, it is its own thing”.

      • Chozo@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        it’s missing 99% people I actually care about following on twitter

        This is what’s stopping me from really giving Mastodon a shot. Nobody that I care about uses it, except for a few bot accounts that are just mirroring that user’s existing Twitter feed, and they’re not even monitoring those accounts on Mastodon so trying to interact with them is fruitless.

      • renrenPDX@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mastodon feels a bit like Twitter back when it was still new, and no celebs or influencers existed. If you had 5k followers or more, you were a big shot.

      • kippidashira@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. There’s a lot mixed messaging from the userbase where we’re recommended to switch to Mastodon from Twitter but also respect that Mastodon is not supposed to be a Twitter replacement.

        • FaceDeer@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It may not be a Twitter replacement, but perhaps it can still fulfill whatever specific needs they’re currently fulfilling using Twitter.

          I’m not the best person to judge since I never really “got” Twitter in the first place, but the basic function of “announcing a small piece of text to the world” is shared by a whole lot of different platforms.

  • Qiz@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will this affect Google search? That’s got to be a good driver for Twitter right?

    Maybe trying to get people that end up there after a search to sign up would be a better tactic.

    • MrMonkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m sure they give the content to the google bots, just not end users. So you see a teaser, click on it, then have to log in.

      Screw that, I’m out!

  • Tester@lemmy-test.223308.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Man seeing all these big websites kill themselves slowly with poor decisions, kind of gives me hope for the future of the internet. Now we just need facebook to really mess up, and things will be even better.

    • Liempong_pagong@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Right, monopolies crumbling will give space to innovation. No one company will buy up smaller company and then put their innovations behind closed doors, never to be seen again.

      Though I doubt google wiill go under for what YouTube is doing. Google is stilll huge and profitable. Most likely it will outlast all of it’s peers from the 2000 dotcom boom.

      Twitter, on the other hand, well. It’s on its 9th live and is hanging by the ledge.