I swear that with each update they’re adding more and more artificial stupidity

  • isildun@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’m not the person who found it originally, but I understand how they did it. We have three useful data points: you are 2.6 km from Burger King in Italy, that BK is on a street called "Via " and you are 9792 km from Burger King in Malaysia.

    1. The upper BK in Malaysia is not censored, so we have its exact location.
    2. Find a place in Italy that is 9792 km away using the Measure Distance tool on something like Google Maps.
    3. Even though there are potentially multiple valid locations in Italy, we know you’re within 2.6 km of another BK. Florence is sensible because there are BKs near the 9792 km mark.
    4. Once we do that, we can find a spot that is both 9792 km from Malaysia BK and 2.6 km from a nearby BK on a street called “Via”, effectively finding where the image was taken.


    It’s not perfect but it works well! This is the principle of how your GPS works. It’s called triangulation. We only had distance to two points and one of them doesn’t tell us the sub-kilometer distance. If we had distance to three points, we could find your EXACT location, within some error depending on how detailed the distance information was.

    • MMauro@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      Good explanation. Just a tiny detail: “via” in Italian literally means “street”, so not much info there.

      • isildun@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oops. Good to know… I guess the main thing was simply that there was a BK in the right place relative to the 9792 km arc then.