• Vqhm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 months ago

        I mean

        There were networks such as: EFnet Undernet Quakenet DALnet

        different servers in different regions did network together.

        There was a different word for ‘defederation’ back then: net split https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netsplit

        And it was usually from a networking issue.

        I’m still salty that an IRCOP from a (now defunct) Canadian server used a net split as an attack: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IRC_takeover

        to steal a # channel from my friends and make it private long enough to sort out the bot auto bans. We appealed, but because they were an IRCOP, the other IRCOPs from the federated servers were just like, “whatever, pound sand users, go run a server if you want to control stuff like us.”

        Anyway, IRC was a connection of various servers run by various people/corporations/universities etc.

    • hansl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      All of the protocols that have been ratified are federated. That was kind of the big thing of the internet. HTTP, SMTP (email), FTP, etc. All federated.

      When people talk about defederating threads, I’m always curious why they think Net Neutrality is a bad idea, or if they’d appreciate if their email providers didn’t allow emails to Gmail because they don’t like big corporations…

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Neutrality is a bad idea, or if they’d appreciate if >their email providers didn’t allow emails to Gmail >because they don’t like big corporations…

        email servers and domains are blocked constantly and have been since the 90’s when they are pushing spam, malware,etc.