• Godort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Honestly, this is not an unreasonable take for 1982.

    The most recent home console would’ve been the Colecovision and the most popular arcade game would’ve been Donkey Kong.

    The NES was still 3 years away and she likely never heard of any of the more narrative PC games of the time like Adventure or Zork.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        That was such a weird take from moms of the era. I remember hearing it all the time as a kid, and I thought it was absolutely stupid. Now that I’m all grown up, I still think it’s absolutely stupid.

    • Knusper@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah, these days it’s obvious that video games are the next logical step in media consumption. First we had audio. Then we had audio+video. Now we have audio+video+interaction. You can literally watch a movie inside of a video game, if you care to.

      But back then, the audio and video qualities of games weren’t yet terribly developed. You could still easily find board games, or heck, sports, that were more complex than Pac-Man and Space Invaders.
      I can definitely see that one would think, it’s a novelty and not be able to imagine how cineastic games would become, or that some even contain books worth of history lessons.

      • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Except the greatest educational game of all time was already ten years old and dead from dysentery by the time she was speaking.

        I think it’s more a case of her certainty coming from a lack of knowledge about the subject and the assumption that because she doesn’t know about it that it doesn’t exist.