Personally I think he needs to be sensible and follow Brown’s lead by keeping the economy steady and stable in the first term whilst driving down inflation and reducing interest payments. Stability first then growth and spending if allowable in the second term.

Some of you might disagree 😉.

    • mannycalavera@feddit.ukOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Starmer has realised that this isn’t the sixties anymore. Labour’s voters don’t identify anymore with just being “not rich” and as such he’s not simply going to wack a load of tax on when he gets into power. Labour have massively rich voters in the south and poor voters in the North (see Brexit).

      So unfortunately it is complicated. 🥹

      • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        So complicated that the only way to win is by attracting shy Tories to vote for you.

        Resulting in the two leading parties having very similar policies and the left wing being left politically homeless.

        • mannycalavera@feddit.ukOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Pretty much, yes.

          A left leaning party hasn’t been in power since the late seventies. But a right leaning one has (several times). The battle is otherwise in the middle ground leading to “shy Tories” voting Labour and Labour Brexit frothers voting for Tories.

        • Stizzah@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Resulting in the two leading parties having very similar policies and the left wing being left politically homeless.

          That’s by design. Welcome in the fake democracy of capitalist countries.