• arefx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I know your question at the end is rhetorical but for anyone who didn’t get it, the change that made us so afraid is nuclear/atomic weapons.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I have no doubt that had they not been dropped on Japan, they would have been used in Korea. All the theory in the world wouldn’t be enough to instill the rightful existential terror nukes cause.

      • bunnyfc@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The difference being that with Korea, it would have already had a fusion booster, which even in early designs increased the yield by a factor of 20-100 (Edit: depending on which pure-fission generation you compare to).

        Edit: Also, I feel we need some tests again that get recorded with modern equipment - the old footage seems like from another world. People should be able to see it in 8K and VR to get properly scared of them.

        • TheChurn@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There is no footage of modern tests because they have been conducted underground since the 60s in order to reduce contamination of the biosphere.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          That as well.

          Whether dropping the bomb was morally right is sort of irrelevant. It was almost certainly going to be used, and it’s better it was the early ones than later ones. Just not in human nature to understand the consequences until our noses are rubbed in it