• ElCrusher@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, the person should be charged with a crime for what he did, but the dog was just following its training as a police dog. They’re supposed to do what the handler tells them to do. It’s not the dogs fault; it did exactly what it was supposed to do had the situation called for the dog to attack.

      • hypelightfly@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The dog attacked an unarmed person

        Yes.

        randomly

        No, it was far from random. The dog was ordered to attack an unarmed person.

    • fubo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Then I suppose the trainer is an accomplice in the crime.

      What would you do with the dog then? Send it to a farm? It’s trained to attack humans. We don’t let a dog like that live in the city.

      • Ryctre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Police dogs retire all the time. Assuming this highly trained animal goes to a cartaker who doesn’t know or issue the commands, that dog is harmless as any other, arguably more so

      • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        It sounds like you just have a problem with concept of police dogs in general. That’s fine, but it’s a separate discussion.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s trained to attack on command. Remove the person giving commands and the dog no longer attacks.

        The dog is not inherently dangerous because it was trained to attack.