• Darkard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Excuse me madam but do you have a license to use those tits? No? Didn’t think so. The content of those bazongas is Nestle property. I’m afraid I’m going to have to clamp those nipples until such time as the proper Bandonkadonk subscriptions are paid”

    • shinratdr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      i got this new legal drama plot. basically there’s this patent infringer except she’s got huge boobs. i mean some serious honkers. a real set of badonkers. packin some dobonhonkeros. massive dohoonkabhankoloos. big ol’ tonhongerekoogers.

      what happens next?!

      lawyer shows up with even bigger bonkhonagahoogs. humongous hungolomghononoloughongous

    • zaphod@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      As long as the tits aren’t used for commercial purposes you don’t need a license. Anyway, I doubt that in Europe you could patent any naturally occuring molecules in any kind of milk.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can patent pretty much anything in Europe.

        However, enforcing those patents is a completely different affair.

        • zaphod@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Maybe some countries’ patent offices don’t take their job serious, but in general there are loads of things you can patent. For example basically anything naturally occuring is not generally patentable, but you can patent methods for synthesising or extracting naturally occuring things.