see them as tactical conversational attacks

Well, fallacies originally were not meant to fool yourself, but to win argument by any means. So you are describing a fallacy, even if it’s not called that

I’m not quite sure that President is above the law until impeached, and that’s what I see in your message

I wouldn’t be surprised if he also trespassed the laws of physics. Luckily this is unlikely

Only third party sync, I use Syncthing for that, works great most of the time

Well then they will have to slightly extend the term (until death do them part)

Remember not to skip your prescriptions

Also you missed their very subtle joke.

If it was a joke, it went way overboard

The article you linked (twice) has this text (highlight is mine):

The term also may be used to refer to the previous status of the Swan Islands, Hawaii, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines, as well as the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands when it existed

And a bit further in the Former Insular Areas it lists:

Puerto Rico: military government, 1899–1900; insular government, 1900–1952; became a commonwealth on July 25, 1952

It contradicts what you’re saying about Puerto Rico still being an Insular Area

a separate country of US citizens.

How’s that supposed to work?

By the way, how does it? I didn’t hear any news for quite some time already 🤔

1. What could’ve fit in a screen of text should not be a video at all
2. I save videos for later all the time, I just watch them never
3. If some information is not visual-first, and not entertainment, if it may be important to people and should be spread, it also better not be a video. Maybe accompanied by a video to make use of audience reach, if you already have a channel with an audience, that is.

Probably not the last one

Bonus points if you guess correct 🌚

I’m with you, I’d joke about circumcision (and maybe ran away 🥲)

Sometimes this is useful, though. Other times it’s infuriating 😅

If he does, how will you feel about selling out Palestinians?

I will feel same as now, so don’t worry

So, you admit that not voting for Dems you vote Trump, but you just think that it’s no big deal, because last time he failed to break everything he touched?

Edit: it’s a pity there’s no travelling to alternative timelines, I’d really love to see what Trump’s victory would lead to, but wouldn’t want to live in that reality.

Maybe better use second most popular: Spanish, it at least uses same letters (differently though ¯\_(ツ)_/¯)

I think it depends on if you want to emphasize something specifically or not. Second ‘that’ is the default it seems, but I first expected ‘was’ to be emphasized in this sentence

The IP owner can print more, but if the owner is gone or legally unclear, then yes. Although I don’t think this was the real intention, because greed looks like a simpler reason and fits