Of course not, but that’s not what Bob and Mike did. Bob and Mike are nearly indistinguishable in terms of military spending, conducting wars abroad, allowing our economy to be plundered, and generally doing jack shit to help ordinary American citizens who are suffering worse and worse as a result.
So yeah. Every single one of them did very bad things, and any differences you can point out are not nearly substantial enough to make any of them worth defending.
Everything Democrats accuse Republicans of is true.
Everything Republicans accuse Democrats of is true.
Biden is bad.
Trump was bad.
Obama was bad.
Bush was bad.
Clinton was bad.
“At least he did X” is not the right thing to focus on.
“But Y was/would have been worse” is not the right thing to focus on.
Yeah, there’s a big difference between “random country” and “home country”.
I experimented with this some time ago and failed because I didn’t have a credit card from the foreign country to pay with. I’m sure this can be circumvented with some effort, but it’s not trivial.
Quite notable, that Bernard.
Your mistake is in thinking that representation in the media/web sphere = representation in the population. White I don’t know the numbers, I reckon that the percentage of the population that doesn’t want a headphone is less than half—possibly much less.
That was nice but early reddit days, before subreddits, were the best days of the Internet.
But that’s literally the way villains behave in the movies.
“Wait! How did you beat me when I hit every note perfectly? I’ve never seen anyone use their whammy bar the entire time—just what in the hell was that?”
“Nao, that’s what I call music.”
What’s the basis for that argument, especially in refutation of his detractors?
Hot take: their browser is good.
Homelessness.
Billionaires.
War.
Magic, aka science and technology.
Yeah they definitely need to pick a more harmful-sounding name than angel wing.
They love war crimes? We love war.
Most Americans naturally want the war to be about slavery—and they object to allegations it’s not—because that’s the morally righteous position, which is the position they want to believe their side held. So telling them the war was about slavery for the South, but the North really didn’t give a shit, is not what they want to hear.
Is this /s or no? Honestly can’t tell; neither would surprise me.
Both perspectives are defensible. The question could be interpreted generally on its own, or in the context of OP’s new-user experience. Personally I would lean towards the latter, but that makes an assumption that the] look