💥⋅🛡️

cio of chen weihua fanclub 👺 she/they tme

🀄💱🍔

  • 0 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 3 months ago
cake
Cake day: October 31st, 2024

help-circle
  • I’ll be honest, the most optimistic outcome for 'muricans I can envision with this TT->XHS thing is a slew of concessions, not unlike New Deal as a reaction to socialist stirrings/comparisons of labor conditions to gains in USSR, or shifting the treats paradigm like trickledown Reaganomics. which I don’t think they can pull off, at least not as easily, since it requires willing participation and buying-in of the public… maybe that can still be manufactured, who knows. More likely though, we’re gonna get turbo McCarthyism and flooring the gas on the new cold war into warmer territory.

    Speaking of the new cold war, I know there’s been speculation about false flag operations as they’ve been used or attempted/contemplated with ukraine and south korea. Of course, intelligence ops in present moment are never privy to the public so we can only really know about stuff in hindsight, if at all, but given (1) the CIA likely had to rebuild (if not the whole thing then a lot of it) from their network in China being dismantled or at least severely damaged in 2010-12, and (2) how loudly western media was bemoaning Xi sweeping the national “house” for corruption… I feel a careful optimism about an unlikely escalation of cold to hot war. China has every interest in keeping it cold and just letting the economics run its course. Of course regarding (1) their network is probably back “online” since it’s been over a decade, although their attempts at stirring up shit like all the US/UK flags during HK separatist or the A4 protests was… laughable, in real terms. I think the effect was more pronounced for the audiences of the theatrics back at home, “freedom lovers” cheering on democracy wins in “authoritarian” states.

    But pandora’s box is open, and definitely can’t be closed - especially on the hypocritical stance on free speech. Tiktok was only shut down 14 hours, what a joke. And everyone knows it’s because of tiktokers (many on the pro-palestine issue) going to XHS. If they ban XHS or force it to become RedNote | XiaoHongShu similar to how Tiktok | Douyin… well, I have heard on the CN side that XHS was contemplating splitting the service by demographic, if anything, for moderation purposes. Which makes sense to me tbh but I doubt they’d sell a split to US, or at least I hope they wouldn’t consider it.


  • Sorry if it’s a bit off-topic, but your frustration feels relevant to my current thing.

    These days I’ve basically made a hobby out of tracking down sources with regards to what I call the “sinophobia machine”, it’s a big ecosystem from yes the usuals at the top from CIA cutouts like RFA and NED which is now directly funded by US Congress, to human rights groups, think tanks, NGOs and academics alike who weigh in with some kind of veneer of expertise. This ecosystem includes so many splinter orgs like “x government in exile” and even sometimes makes connections with splinter orgs from the falungong cult media empire. Oh, and all the Chinese dissidents and liberals who are genuinely convinced of western democracy, as well as white guys in yellowface “pseudonyms,” who get passed around in western news media as serious (implied independent) activists – the very same news outlets that denigrate domestic BIPOC activists ranging from landback to BLM. Western mainstream media loves to pull sources from all of these kinds of groups, soaps it all up and spins and spins anti-China yarns to their unquestioning masses of devoted audiences, who then repeat and croak up their own anti-China, uh, memes? like pooh bear. Even when their audiences question the veracity and trustworthiness of their media and calls it “fake news”, the sinophobic stories are rarely, if ever, questioned. **

    Sometimes I have to pinch myself cuz it’s so widespread, there’s so much going on and not a lot of people are discussing or even seem to be aware of how deep those roots are buried… yeah I feel like conspiracy theorist, but I literally have all the threads lining up. The other day I was reviewing a list (thanks wikipedia, you are a den of imperial core simps but man there’s so many crumb trails goddamn) of the more prominent Chinese dissident student protesters from the June fourth incident who were ahem evacuated by CIA/MI6+triad+whoever involvement in Operation Yellowbird and I stumbled onto a guy who founded an Asian American organization that had participation in leading/organizing parts of the #stopaapihate movement. I know they’re not like directly controlled in a straight line to some grand puppet master, not even close because that would be absurd, but this stuff is so interconnected I’m starting to feel like I’m losing it. I’m glad the RedNote/小红书 thing is happening right now, but I doubt it will lead to anything like a consciousness of what I’ve described above.

    ** I do also want to point out that in large part I view asian americans (general, not every individual), which I am one of, as part and participants of this occurring, or at least allowing sinophobia to go rampant, in the present day. In Houston area back in 2014, a Chinese immigrant family was found all shot dead in their home. There were rumors in the diaspora community that the dad was either an official or industry head that escaped the anti-corruption sweep in the mainland (thank you Xi) and a lot of people including my parents speculated that it was an extrajudicial hit saying that the murders were really clean and nobody found their bodies in their house for a long time. And for a long time no leads turned up so the rumors lingered. Well, 8 years later in 2022 the police found their man with both DNA evidence and a motive (coworker), not CPC hitmen. Contrast with this: in 1994 Connie Chung spread a sinophobic trope on CBS, and I quote: “Every day, planeloads of Chinese citizens arrive legally in the United States, ordinary people, but to the Chinese Government, some of them may be future spies, who a few years down the road will be activated to steal America’s military and technological secrets, whether they want to or not.” Various Asian American groups actually protested this for four months and they eventually got CBS to air an apology and correction. Can you imagine that today?


  • 50-50, also I have periods when I look here a lot and periods where my attention is in other places

    • more inclined to engage if parts of the article was highlighted/quoted in the text belonging to the 'grad post, but then again, I might not have a reason to actually click thru to the article
    • prefer not to click off especially if it’s hegemonic newsmedia nyt bbc economist etc as more often than not they write FOR headlines than detailed content. also paywalls
    • despite that, depending on the topic, I might be less lazy and find an archive or mirror to give it a peek
    • more likely to see what’s up and read/skim if it’s other publications and I think more likely to glean value from.

  • seconded

    There’s a certain type of joy (some may call elevated haterism, idk) in critically consuming media. There’s “criticism” that reads like critic is doing “this is badism” (of which I can’t wash my hands of, especially when it comes to picking up and smelling dubious content. In my defense, sometimes you gotta sniff shit to remember what it smells like. Maybe conspiratorial but, hey, $1.6 billion towards anti-china media is going Somewhere, and it’s not just right-wing rags. However I will defend myself here in differentiating trying to figure out who’s behind writing these “leftist” articles, articles that ‘actual’ western “leftists” are taking as some kind of veritable authority and source on info in China;; versus someone (repeatedly) criticizing Pentagon-funded Marvel flicks, which I think, to most people who find themselves in this neck of the woods, has a forgone conclusion)…

    …and then there’s media crit for the joy of it. There’s envisioning how the media could be better, even given the circumstances. There’s separating the threads of “applicable to my social fabric/this moment-at-this-time situations” and malarkey - for example, I think The Substance picks up on relevant topics to this era but uncritically touches on plenty of other things I find to be just as concerning. Yes, if you’re not in whatever specific industry, most likely your opinions won’t go anywhere relevant towards improving said media but::

    Art isn’t isolated, art is a medium that relies on there being a relationship, a communication, between artist and audience. And artist and audience aren’t mutually exclusive groups!! And as such, art is usually part of a continuum of other pieces of art, being relational to other pieces of art/artists; a myriad of relationships such as responses, push/pull, part of the same movement, inspire each other (very much includes orientalist european art, and I say this with the most neutrality I can: example Van Gogh & other europeans having some source of inspiration from Japanese blockprint), responding or reviving other pieces, antagonism of competing art movement in same era, etc etc etc. In this era of capitalist society that continuum is commonly “hey this thing made a lot of money so I will try to do something similar to get same result”, but even so relationships between specific pieces of media or even whole art movements aren’t simply one type of relationship.

    All that to just say: being an audience of art, regardless of individual politics, means you are part of what “makes” art. IMO being thinky about it makes it better; like, I have an affection for films that are “so bad it’s good” but absolutely detest slop although I sometimes find slop very funny. beatboxing puppy. Although more often than not, being a communist sympathizer (being realistic/vulgar materialist especially to my locale) living in the west just means there’s a lot of media around me that have messages I find from bad to flawed, but that doesn’t stop me from recognizing other areas it does well or enjoying that.

    Personally I think 100% divestment is a mistake, no you don’t need to be actively constantly consuming everything presented, I think it’s worth at least being aware especially if it’s in your surroundings. It’s like critically reading or exposing yourself to liberal mainstream news media; it’s just in the air you breathe, and I get it, it might get tiring smelling the stench 24/7; but it’s still valuable to be able to glean useful information and understand what particular angles are frequented, and better yet if you know other info and see what’s being purposefully omitted.



  • There are a few types of “AI” generated art that I enjoy but they’re relatively niche (usually surreal, more or less obviously has a human purposefully guiding it with a style/angle - eg actually using it as a tool rather than content slop generator), but by and large it’s much more common to come across uncanny valley or straight-up disturbing products nowadays. And much of it cookie-cutter. tbh I’m very limited on social media/wider common internet useage and tailor my feeds highly selectively/avoid as much as possibly the ones that push algorithmic content but even so the slop spills over sometimes. That said I just Can’t watch the “AI” gen videos that CGTN sometimes puts out but the good thing is that they follow Chinese laws and very obviously demarcate “this is ‘AI’ generated” so it’s easy to avoid it. Can’t say the same about other places - I briefly looked back at pinterest a couple months ago (back in the day I had curated some moodboards with friends) and it was just unusable.

    Speaking of, western media (including social media) has a history of appropriating images from unrelated contexts to generate mountains of atrocity propaganda especially regarding China and specifically XUAR. Can’t wait for East Turkestan Government in Exile and other US Congress/NED/CIA backed groups to start using “AI” to fabricate atrocity propaganda, can only hazard a guess they might use footage from real active genocides (eg currently committed by Isreal) to generate such atrocity propaganda, then passed off as real by western mainstream media /sarcasm (But yeah as someone else already noted, coulda been doing this in photoshop all along. AI would just make it faster particularly for video formats, which makes selling the fabrications as real easier)

    I put “AI” in this context in quotes because it’s anything but “intelligent”, in the sense of General Artificial Intelligence. Learning Machine? eh, shakey, it can only reflect biases inherent to its training data, can’t escape or grow away from it. Big Data Doohickey? sure. Calling “generative content/content detection machines that use training data” -> “AI” was such a techbro upselling to venture capitalists thing and I hate it. sorry for random rant