deleted by creator

deleted by creator

Idk, how come we need to fund your wars?

Reluctantly choosing to stay with someone you know is hurting you because you feel like you have no choice isn’t exactly a healthy relationship either. If you’re in other ones like that please run.

Can we please stop defending Biden every time he hurts us?

I honestly pray Biden voters never have human relationships that resemble their parasocial-electoral ones with Biden, it’s terrifyingly similar to abusive relationships.

What disgusting people those ‘settelers’ are.

How that seperation of church and state going son?

The federal Constitution prevents any state from recalling a member of congress, so your federal reps can not be recalled legally. They would have to be expelled from within the congress, you get to vote and thats it.

Yeah and whos gonna stop him? It’s not like he was doing something as horrible as condeming the Israelie slaughter of innocents, then maybe we could do something like hold a vote on how much we don’t like him.

I dont believe voting does much, but I know refusing to vote doesn’t do anything, I don’t see why I wouldn’t show up.

Early operations losses are normal and not a cause for immediate concern, the CFO quitting after a yelling match with the CEO is though.

If this went anything like the yelling matches I hear in local companies between CFOs or even CPAs vs the CEOs, it likely boils down to the CEO being ingorant of the finer details of financial law and reporting practices and insisting that the CFO or CPA do something that’s either against best practice, or flat out inappropriate or borderline illegal.

The CFO I know personally gets yelled at consistently for doing things that are the reason outside financers still work with the company. They’re also the sole reason the IRS isn’t levying hell against the buisness and the owners wife grovels to them to assure that at least she knows how important the work is.

The takeawy is CEOs are pretty dumb and hate being told no, and I’d honestly be surprised if the reality of the situation is much different from the one I described.

Not just GM, if you tried ro question the safety of these cars on even Lemmy before these revelations came out you would get brigaded by people claiming they were safer than humans statistically and thats all they needed to be in order to be acceptable.

Not a ‘new’ American Dream, just one of the extremely few American Dreams left.

So how much genocide in your opinion is okay to vote for under the suspicion that someone else might also do a genocide?

Because either you’re admitting theres no way to vote ourselves out of genocide or that joes genocides is okay because someone else MAY also preside over genocide. Thats a new one, this genocide is acceptable because if it wasn’t this, it would just be another genocide, do I have that right?

Im of the opinion that I cannot materially support genocide. Call it single issue voterism if you want but to me never again means never again, not never again unless maybe the someone else would also finance genocide. Having boundaries is healthy and just, and if genocide is only a soft boundary for someone then I place no value in what they have to say.

“Hello yes I’m your insurance agent, now before I read this decision to you, are you now or were you ever a lawyer? No? Okay denied get fucked L + ratio.”

Republicans could call all jews the k word but as long as they still support Israel, they’d be fine, and probably get aipac donations for it.

The only thing lobbists like more than someone they already bribed and have on speed dail is someone who too old to realize they’re being conned.

I think the sad fact is many people in the US are okay with financing genocide as long as they don’t have to hear Trump’s name or suffer any consequences personally. As long as some kind of right wing boogeymany exists, you can convince most democratic voters that genocide is permissable enough to not disqualify a candidate.

They’re there to sheepdog the voters into believing progressive candidates a valued part of the democratic party despite the fact that more than most of the good things progressives have accomplished are entirely outside of the chambers of congress. The democrats refuse to work with progressives unless they are forced too, like that time the progressives asked Pelosi to consider stock trading bans and she denied them until it was clear that was horrible PR, then decided to come around to vocally supporting it later, once the political will to pass the bill was dying down. Progressives are there for show.

Most of his base likes him because he’s a bad candidate. They have been trained by their chosen media to desire bad traits and cast uncertainty and doubt on good traits. They love him precisely because he is horrible. If there was a worse candidate than Trump, they’d vote for them instead. In fact many of these people who are already fed up with Trump are going right to RFK because they desire bad traits.