

CAMM has been around for years at this point and I’ve only seen them in a couple devices so, no, I don’t think so. They still can’t match the speed of solder either.
CAMM has been around for years at this point and I’ve only seen them in a couple devices so, no, I don’t think so. They still can’t match the speed of solder either.
Reminder that all AMD’s “AI” processors require soldered memory.
Also they already made an appearance in the Framework desktop. It’s garbage.
We’re not talking about takedown requests, we’re talking about bypassing DRM.
They added cross-platform search recently to local instances “vidiverse”. Sepia search was also integrated into the Grayjay app.
I’m not aware of any degradation of Sepia search.
It’s not a “take”, it is a fact.
Stop commenting unless you have evidence to the contrary.
Since the title makes absolutely no sense:
To balance AOSP’s open nature with its product development strategy, Google maintains two primary Android branches: the public AOSP branch and its internal development branch. The AOSP branch is accessible to anyone, while Google’s internal branch is restricted to companies with a Google Mobile Services (GMS) licensing agreement. While some OS components, such as Android’s Bluetooth stack, are developed publicly in the AOSP branch, most components, including the core Android OS framework, are developed privately within Google’s internal branch. Google confirmed to Android Authority that it will soon shift all Android OS development to its internal branch, a change intended to streamline its development process.
It really was. Do you not know what the DMCA is? It’s US law.
That’s great. This conversation was about the US.
We were talking about laws, not rights or views.
Didn’t realize the DMCA applied in Sweden.
If another law says you have a right to create
That law doesn’t exist and that’s not how law works. Law does not specify what is allowed, only what isn’t. Breaking encryption isn’t.
Congratulations, test failed successfully
There is no “more illegal”. One is illegal, the other is not.
The DMCA makes it pretty clear that “Circumvention of Technological Protection Measures” is illegal. There are no exceptions for whether you own or redistribute the content in question.
My man throwin’ it back LOL
Bazzite is great but people are going to be far more likely to install SteamOS just because it’s Steam.
Is that Parappa the rapper?
I mean “real SteamOS” has always been available. It was just never tailored to those devices.
You didn’t say anything to indicate that I was incorrect.