- Carbon monoxide
Geothermal: Incredibly old sky-spiciness from far, far away that Earth collected to slowly release.
Thing is, unless we first found it way later, people would just think they’re referencing the runes.
Could they have stolen the story? Yes. But they could have equally had a similar experience, it’s not that implausible. I’ve known people that have nose bleeds like that, it’s not some incredibly rare condition, and saying hail Satan is the kind of thing tons of edgy kids/teens would do.
Things can happen more than once.
That’s why I love physical, things like directors commentary. The most ridiculous part is it would be very easy to include that on streaming services as a language option. Other special features could be put on there as well. Don’t see why they don’t use it as an extra selling point.
I don’t disagree.
Thanks, I’ll check it out later tonight.
That’s how it is in Australia. There’s not literally a nil box, but voting is compulsory and once you turn up and have your name marked off you’re good to go, you can vote or just submit a blank paper which is essentially the same thing.
I mean this in the most respectful way possible, but is there something you can name that religion does explain without relying on faith of some kind? I would never claim science has all the answers, but if I’m going to attempt to take religion seriously it has to start by giving at least a single answer.
Nice, I’ll have to see if I can dig up my apk of the paid version.
Can you log in yet? Last time I did this I couldn’t log into an account, only browse.
Put both of those onto an aussie pizza and you have perfection.
Honestly sometimes I wish I could brainwash myself that effectively.
Disagree, if every user of these 10 apps did this it would end up a lot better for them all than every user choosing their favourite and giving them $50. If they choose randomly it would end up roughly the same, but in general people are going to end up skewing towards certain apps over others when forced to choose a favourite.
And if doing it randomly ends up the same as splitting it on a large scale, I think this is the more sensible approach personally.
Right but you’re trying to avoid them leaving before that in case you get a win and don’t need to make the lay-offs. If they leave earlier the win you’re hoping for may no longer be enough to save you.
Just curious what’s your setup?
Those are laws. If you want a law that bans tipping and assures a higher wage for waiters then sure, that’s fine, but boycotting businesses won’t get those laws made.
If no one is going there and they don’t know why, and they’re losing money because they’re not getting enough business, they’re not going to decide the solution is to start paying their waiters more. That will just cause them to close down sooner.
Also, just as they don’t know why people stopped going there unless every single one calls them and makes it clear it’s due to tipping/wages, the people protesting aren’t going to know even if they do start paying the waiters more.
Almost every waiter I’ve ever spoken to also prefers tipping because they make more than if they were being paid more, because the business isn’t going to pay them as high as they were making in tips (on average).
The only way they even could, is if they raised the price of everything by 25%. As much as people say they’d be fine with that, such high prices would drive some number of people away. There’s also the issue that if the business owner realised people would pay that much higher, they’d inevitably keep some for themselves and only somewhat increase server wages.
This isn’t to say that I think avoiding tipping is the way to fix it either, just that I don’t think it’s as clear cut as just avoiding the business.