Just read the article. The fact are right there backed by science and major health orgs.

It doesn’t matter. The intended audience has already decided that they want to believe Trump and immigrants are bad and they vote illegally.

Honestly, I trust the betting markets more than the pollsters. Money on the line makes a difference.

True. Doesn’t matter if he wins or loses. He’ll claim he won no matter the results and he’ll be equally crazy.

Honestly a bit surprised by this. I would have thought Boomers were more skeptical about voting machines than young voters.

FREEDOM!!!

Lol. This is awesome. What a bunch of douchebag losers.

Yes, definitely give everyone treats. Not everyone has the opportunity to dress up for various reasons.

I was once a proponent of cashless societies. Not anymore. Too many vulnerabilities, too many ways for governments to take control of your finances.

If Republicans get their way, voting by anything other than in-person on election day will be banned.

The ATL area is carrying the state of Georgia now. That’s what has changed over the past three decades. The GOP has a hard time in any state where there’s a large dominant urban area. That’s not really a new thing.

I commend the effort and the long post to explain yourself, but it’s ultimately conjecture. None of the battleground states will go “decisively” to any of the candidates.

And watch a ton of women stand in line on election day to vote for Trump.

No. The Republican Party is now a cult devoted to a person. The party will not be able to move on until that person is out of the picture.

There has been a lot of talk to pressure Democrats on the Arab issue, including during the primaries. At the end of the day, the Democratic agenda is much more friendly toward Palestine than the Republican agenda. Most Arab-Americans are fully aware of that and it will probably show on election day. But they may as well try to get as many concessions as possible before the election by threatening to withhold their vote. Makes sense.

if she had taken a position like, “Israel has a right to defend itself, but the bloodshed in Gaza has gone on long enough, and we must acknowledge that the Netanyahu administration has been a major obstacle in ceasefire negotiations,” she would have been massively more appealing to Palestinian supporters

Thing is that she doesn’t really have to. She’s already massively more attractive to Palestinian supporters than Trump or not voting. That’s the problem with a two-party system with only two real choices.

Fact is that no matter what position Kamala takes on this, she’ll lose votes somewhere and win votes somewhere. Most Jewish people vote for Democrats. Trump just straight up does not care about Palestine. That’s a much more simplistic take.

Republicans won’t care. It’s projection.

Yes, it’s definitely worth mentioning. Thanks.

It’s also the same people who claim that moral integrity is the end-all-be-all in leadership while having no problem supporting a person for the ultimate leadership position whose views on women include “grab’em by the pussy.” The moral superiority is pretty much gone.