I think what we have here is a misunderstanding. Whatever his sexuality, Garak is clearly just a plain, simple, tailor.
Whatever his sexuality
It’s plain and simple. He’s pretty forward about that.
Am I like tone deaf or something because I never got like a gay vibe from him.
deleted by creator
Ya ive read that the actor played him gay but I didn’t learn that till after I’d watched it all so I guess knowing that he is straight makes it even harder for me to see it. Tbh I could have a guy hit on me and not know it and I do have some pretty “weird” ideas/beliefs and stuff that I don’t think a lot of mainstream straight guys have or would even agree with
His interaction with the doctor was very romantic. Not sexual, just delightfully romantic.
I just thought they were buds just like O’Brien and the doc. Never got a gay vibe from it I just thought it was 2 guys being friends with eachother.
Can you give an example of how it was romantic?
Time for you to go watch season 1 again. 🙂
Guess I’m just super tone deaf cuz that didn’t look gay to me.
Yes
According to Andrew Robinson’s book Garak is bisexual though. Also if you haven’t listened to Andrew Robinson reading “A Stitch in Time” you’re missing out.
Where’s a Garak? the new hit game of finding characters like Garak in other media!
It’s basically Garak and Ashok for this trope
https://twitter.com/MlNDMELD/status/1601549565751984128
(Sorry for the Twitter link, couldn’t find another source)
Why are you apologizing for a Twitter link?
Fuck it, Im blocking this sub. Garak is not gay, men are allowed to have friendships with other men. Yall are worse than ao3 with your fanshipping.
The actor who played Garak is on record saying that he played the character as bi, with a crush on Bashir.
Andrew Robinson himself has said in many interviews that he played the character as “Omnisexual,” and initially attracted to Bashir. In fact, he was originally written that way until Rick Berman put an end to it out of nothing more than homophobia, but Robinson continued to play him that way regardless.
I love when actors do this out of a genuine love for the potential of a character, star trek would be so much worse if it wasn’t for so many actors challenging the ethical and visionary failings of the script both through their acting and directly speaking up. It matters less that the script never ships bashir and garak (I thinkkk I haven’t finished though… hahaha) because the acting makes it true no matter what the narrative says on paper or what dialog happens between them.
It is always about what is implied by what we are being shown isn’t it? Especially if you don’t quitteeee take the words the actors are literally saying at face value as the only dimension of truth.
Nothing is more fitting for garak in a way, though that is more sad than anything because the show would have been richer with an openly queer garak.
I love when actors do this out of a genuine love for the potential of a character
Frakes and Sirtis did this with their characters as well in TNG.
Aside from the initial introduction to their past relationship, the writers wanted to leave it in the past so that they could explore other stories. But the actors played it up every chance they could get.
That still didn’t stop the writers from pushing Troi and Worf together toward the end for some bizarre reason. But if not for the actors’ efforts to keep things alive throughout the run of TNG, Troi and Riker may not have ended up together in the end.
“Your pants are ready to be picked up, Doctor,” was their fuck code. I mean, seriously, nobody gets their pants altered that often.
Berman said to knock it off, but the whole cast and crew kept it going low-key for the rest of the series.
What I find funny is I blocked the sub, and I still see the replies. I can reply from my inbox, but I can’t go and see the post itself. Interesting how it all works.
Friendship is for chicks, I have rivals and subordinates
Would a straight man bring a disruptor to their first date with a woman?