• Z3R0C00l@artemis.camp
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 year ago

    2 months later…

    This week in technology, Google abandons yet another project. 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    finallly what google has been missing, an instant messenger application/protocol.

    thanks google for really finding a gap and filling a need.

  • flop_leash_973@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just what a successful Google service needs, to be associated with the failure that is their messaging platform attempts.

  • VodkaSolution @feddit.it
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Will they succeed in making even Gmail fail?
    I can already see memes with the Gmail icon and the obvious “task failed successfully”

      • protist@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what I was wondering…the “chat” and “spaces” functions are already fully integrated into Gmail and are instant messaging. We used them extensively at my previous place of work. The article seems to be more about Google incentivizing chat-like responses to emails, which would be awful.

  • foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You can react to emails with emoji right now. At least on Android.

    Which at first I thought “thAts fucking dumb”

    But now I can react 👍 instead of sending stupid, loathsome ‘Thanks!’ emails.

    • johan@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      But what happens if someone sends you an email from a non-gmail account? Can you react then?

      If so, does it just reply to this email with an emoji in the body? Cause then you’re basically just replying in the exact way as before, google just added a quick-reply button with a predefined body.

      I’m personally not a fan of nonstandard functionality for something as ubiquitous as email. Email should be exactly the same regardless of the client that’s used.

      • foggy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They get an email that says “foggy@gmail reacted to your email with 👍”

  • tsonfeir@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    They don’t even have a desktop app for gmail chat. Whatever they do, they’ll abandon.

  • DreamButt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m so fucking tired of companies trying to “innovative.” Just give me my shitty government provided email service already so I can ignore it like I do snail mail

  • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Assuming this is aimed at business use: good, but too little too late.

    Tacking on chat features isn’t going to bring businesses back from Slack and Teams. The ship has sailed. Email exists as a lowest common denominator and a way for lead generators to harass people who don’t actually make procurement decisions.

    Email won’t die but it’s on indefinite LTS.

      • vinniep@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        The bit that kills me is that “make Google Chat not suck” doesn’t seem to be in the list of options for addressing this problem at all. I work for a company that uses GSuite and chat is universally loathed with a bunch of Slack instances running around the company, both sanctioned and unsanctioned. If they spent time working to improve chat, the momentum of being a GSuite company would carry the rest of the weight here. It doesn’t have to be better than Slack, just closer.

      • ares35@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        or they’re trying to turn (g)mail into a shitty, high-latency, unreliable alternative to imessage.

      • killeronthecorner@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean that it’s no longer actively being improved as a competitor to other forms of communication. Chat has taken over the world in both personal and business settings.

        It’s not going to die because it’s the de facto default when nothing else is available, but it’s also not going to rise up and compete with modern chat solutions which are already ten times as feature rich and continuing to evolve.

        • systemglitch@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not meant to, I think it is perfect for the role it fills. I see it as thriving at what it set out to do, neither on life support nor struggling to maintain its achieved identity.

          Always trying to improve things is often a very real problem. Email, like so many other things should have been, is best left as is.

          (PS I did not downvote your comment)