• Termight@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    James May added: “The thing that really bothers me is road sectarianism. Quite a few people in cars seem to be somehow offended by people riding bicycles because they’ve paid all this money for a car and think therefore they should be rewarded for it, but often they’re just not using the car very intelligently.” 👍

    • Random Dent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I have to admit I’m a bit guilty of this, but from both sides. I bike more than I drive, and when I’m driving all cyclists are a menace and are in the way, but when I bike all drivers are reckless idiots who are trying to kill me.

      • Thebigguy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        11 days ago

        The rule of the road is that any one going slower or faster than you is a menace, this applies to everyone with pedestrians being at the bottom of the food chain.

      • lilpatchy2eyes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 days ago

        I still think about the time I passed a bicyclist on the road, reached a red light, and saw him pass between all the cars that had just passed him to stop in front of me again. We all had to pass him again.

      • easily3667@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 days ago

        To be fair most cyclists in major cities have a death wish. I don’t have another way to describe wearing all black in winter with no lights driving against traffic in a car lane (where there is also a dedicated, separated bike lane), and ignoring all stop signs and traffic signals. It’s a death wish.

        Yes it’s mostly doordash et al, but just because doordash doesn’t care about it’s workers doesn’t mean the workers don’t have to.

  • B-TR3E@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    12 days ago

    Obviously TV stars are the right people to ask about city planning. Because city planners and architects have given up the concept of automotive cities as recently as 1970 and nobody has been giving a fuck since then. On of the fathers of the original idea, Le Corbusier, declared the automotive city as failed because of the sheer number of cars . The automobile revolution had, in his opinion turned into an automobile explosion and no reasonable concept could handle the volume of traffic that were far beyond the estimations the original idea was based on. Nevertheless reasonable political reactions on the total failure of dealing with permanently increasing inner city infvidual traffic are still an exception. Because Hans Wurst and Joe Moron must have their car an arm’s length away from their sofas or they’ll either die from exhaustion walking to the convenience store or from acute lack of beer and potato chips…

  • j_elgato@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 days ago

    You all heard Captain Slow.

    Hand over them keys.

    Actually, that would be amazing. Unfortunately, living in a major North American city, I don’t have enough wealth to be without a car.

    • Lumbardo@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 days ago

      Man I really wish we weren’t so entrenched in this car-centric city planning philosophy. Public transit just doesn’t get it done around here compared to abroad.

      • j_elgato@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 days ago

        Works fine as long as you don’t mind being late. Limiting your travel times. Tripling the length of your commute. And braving a mobile-psychiatric dayroom environment in order to go anywhere…

    • Parasail2109@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      They can if people clean after their dog and keep them on leash in public spaces. The problem is always the people in the end.

      • Danquebec@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        11 days ago

        I rhink dog owners should pay a tax that would pay for weekly poop cleaning.

        Only new dog owners though, as to not penalize current ones.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 days ago

        correct, because cats don’t belong outside at all, they should be kept indoors for their safety and the safety of the ecosystem.

        • Polderviking@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          Dogs need a large space to roam.

          No they don’t, they just need their owner to not be lazy SOB’s and be taken out for half decent walks.

          People tend to only take them to the nearest field for ten minutes so they can take a dump, and even that has do be done staring down a smartphone screen 80 percent of the time. You could live on a farm with a large plot of land but that’d still be inadequate engagement.

          Some people should’ve just straight up not gotten a dog at all, regardless of where they live. If you adequately engage your dog it could live with you in one of those glorified New York broom closets.

  • OmegaLemmy@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    I AGREE BAN CARS INVEST IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT 250 MILLION EURO IN ONE EAR SERVED 1 MILLION PEOPLE FOR 20 YEARS!!!

    BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN BAN