Should France and the UK share their nuclear weapons with the rest of Europe?

  • seeigel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    How does this pen out? If those weapons are meant to be used defencively, they have to be second-strike weapons.

    This means that Germany needs nuclear submarines because everything else could be hit by Russian nuclear bombs in the assumed Russian attack.

    Preparing nuclear weapons on fighter jets only helps to make Germany a target.

    France and UK rightfully ask for support for their nuclear weapons program but there is no need to be further involved than financing it.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      Germany has nuclear-capable subs. There was a whole thing about exporting subs to Israel because they might put nukes on them.

      Nuclear-powered is a whole other thing. Type 212s can’t dive as long as nuclear subs but it’s definitely sufficient (18 days is publicly known, they probably can do way more), and on the upside they’re way less detectable than nuclear subs which are loud AF due to being powered by steam engines on angry steroids.

      • bestboyfriendintheworld@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        The Dolphin submarines for Israel are built bz Germany, but they are different because they’re are to launch nukes. German submarines aren’t equipped with the same size launch tubes. Germany could build such subs though.